<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Miles Langley - Pop Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popsocial.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popsocial.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Future Trends / Innovation / Strategy / Creative</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:59:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Brand Engagement by Tim</title>
		<link>http://popsocial.wordpress.com/2009/04/20/brand-engagement/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsocial.wordpress.com/?p=493#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I’ve been monitoring the development of the Z4 campaign since I watched the making of the ad via Wallpaper* (www.wallpaper.com/cars/behind-the-scenes-bmw-z4-ad-shoot/2937)  in the last quarter of 2008. The campaign strikes me as being noteworthy, but not necessarily for the customer engagement options highlighted above. 

BMW are industry leaders at product campaigns and again seem to have created the right campaign mix (including customer engagement strategies) – if not the correct weightings across the mix. However, from the outcome and form of the ad, it strikes me that this campaign was probably not created with conversational possibilities forefront of mind. Rather it probably conceived as a creative idea in response to an internally perceived shortcoming.

This ad potentially marks a lack of confidence at BMW regarding the strength of their current advertising format. BMW ads since the introducing of the current Design Director have overwhelming been shot in focus, from the front/ side quarter with gleaming paint work (post production) against a soft or out-of-focus background, typically a road (take a quick tour through their website www.bmw.co.uk). In short, they have been about the ‘experience’ of driving. The Z4, by comparison, is shot from a high angle against the white canvas – the creation of a piece of art.  It is striking that the car in their range that is most about pure driving pleasure communicates the ‘joy of driving’ conceptually.

The fact that the campaign ticks all the right the boxes in terms of consumer communication/engagement possibilities, says more about BMW’s marketing expertise rather than the campaign itself. 

The question remains whether BMW feels that their existing advertising format is tired and this campaign marks a new direction – or whether they perceived a special approach was required to target buyers of the Z4. Either way one can be sure that lessons learnt from this campaign will be incorporated in future campaigns across the range – and we’ll do well to monitor how things progress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been monitoring the development of the Z4 campaign since I watched the making of the ad via Wallpaper* (www.wallpaper.com/cars/behind-the-scenes-bmw-z4-ad-shoot/2937)  in the last quarter of 2008. The campaign strikes me as being noteworthy, but not necessarily for the customer engagement options highlighted above. </p>
<p>BMW are industry leaders at product campaigns and again seem to have created the right campaign mix (including customer engagement strategies) – if not the correct weightings across the mix. However, from the outcome and form of the ad, it strikes me that this campaign was probably not created with conversational possibilities forefront of mind. Rather it probably conceived as a creative idea in response to an internally perceived shortcoming.</p>
<p>This ad potentially marks a lack of confidence at BMW regarding the strength of their current advertising format. BMW ads since the introducing of the current Design Director have overwhelming been shot in focus, from the front/ side quarter with gleaming paint work (post production) against a soft or out-of-focus background, typically a road (take a quick tour through their website <a href="http://www.bmw.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.bmw.co.uk</a>). In short, they have been about the ‘experience’ of driving. The Z4, by comparison, is shot from a high angle against the white canvas – the creation of a piece of art.  It is striking that the car in their range that is most about pure driving pleasure communicates the ‘joy of driving’ conceptually.</p>
<p>The fact that the campaign ticks all the right the boxes in terms of consumer communication/engagement possibilities, says more about BMW’s marketing expertise rather than the campaign itself. </p>
<p>The question remains whether BMW feels that their existing advertising format is tired and this campaign marks a new direction – or whether they perceived a special approach was required to target buyers of the Z4. Either way one can be sure that lessons learnt from this campaign will be incorporated in future campaigns across the range – and we’ll do well to monitor how things progress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Giving Away Your Content to Make Money? by Miles Langley</title>
		<link>http://popsocial.wordpress.com/2009/04/09/giving-away-your-content/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Langley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsocial.wordpress.com/?p=482#comment-59</guid>
		<description>An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thersa.org/__data/assets/file/0010/193564/lecture080409b.mp3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interesting lecture&lt;/a&gt; from just last night (09 April 09) here in London at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thersa.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The RSA&lt;/a&gt;. Of a particularly good listening is the second speaker &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Titus&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Richard Titus&lt;/a&gt; who&#039;s achievement include &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avenue_A/Razorfish&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Razorfish&lt;/a&gt; and who currently is the BBC&#039;s &quot;Corporation&#039;s Future Media Controller for Audio &amp; Music and Mobile&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.thersa.org/__data/assets/file/0010/193564/lecture080409b.mp3" rel="nofollow">interesting lecture</a> from just last night (09 April 09) here in London at <a href="http://www.thersa.org" rel="nofollow">The RSA</a>. Of a particularly good listening is the second speaker <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Titus" rel="nofollow">Richard Titus</a> who&#8217;s achievement include <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avenue_A/Razorfish" rel="nofollow">Razorfish</a> and who currently is the BBC&#8217;s &#8220;Corporation&#8217;s Future Media Controller for Audio &amp; Music and Mobile&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letting it Out by Miles Langley</title>
		<link>http://popsocial.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/letting-it-out/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Langley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsocial.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Good call Amber, we are naive to think that anything we do is either private or anonymous these days. Yesterday at Future Perfect I read a post on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.janchipchase.com/blog/archives/2009/03/privacy-marginal-costs.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Privacy &amp; Marginal Costs&lt;/a&gt; quite interesting (and semi-related)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call Amber, we are naive to think that anything we do is either private or anonymous these days. Yesterday at Future Perfect I read a post on <a href="http://www.janchipchase.com/blog/archives/2009/03/privacy-marginal-costs.html" rel="nofollow">Privacy &amp; Marginal Costs</a> quite interesting (and semi-related)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Letting it Out by Amber</title>
		<link>http://popsocial.wordpress.com/2009/03/30/letting-it-out/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsocial.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Interesting post. When I first started using twitter it was an &quot;anything goes&quot; virtual space. As time went on, I noticed &quot;followers&quot; and consciously started editing my outputs. Ditto my blog.

However... sometimes you just have to let go, and its nice to think you&#039;ve shared. I think anonymous spaces are excellent, and catharsis is a worthy goal. But I believe we should all be conscious that ALL information on the net is potentially public. Basic solution: I just vent &quot;thoughts I&#039;ll never tweet&quot; in a text file. Then purge regularly :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post. When I first started using twitter it was an &#8220;anything goes&#8221; virtual space. As time went on, I noticed &#8220;followers&#8221; and consciously started editing my outputs. Ditto my blog.</p>
<p>However&#8230; sometimes you just have to let go, and its nice to think you&#8217;ve shared. I think anonymous spaces are excellent, and catharsis is a worthy goal. But I believe we should all be conscious that ALL information on the net is potentially public. Basic solution: I just vent &#8220;thoughts I&#8217;ll never tweet&#8221; in a text file. Then purge regularly <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You&#8217;re Telling Everyone Your Innermost Secrets by justinweiler</title>
		<link>http://popsocial.wordpress.com/2009/03/27/we-tell-everyone/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>justinweiler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsocial.wordpress.com/?p=430#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Is it best to verbalize a fleeting thought.. (i.e. the ones above) or leave them be
and internalize them? 
 
Personally.. Internalize, because I know that nothing in life is permanent.  It works for me, 
what about you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it best to verbalize a fleeting thought.. (i.e. the ones above) or leave them be<br />
and internalize them? </p>
<p>Personally.. Internalize, because I know that nothing in life is permanent.  It works for me,<br />
what about you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About Me by Caroline</title>
		<link>http://popsocial.wordpress.com/about/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 08:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Hey Miles,
great to hear your enjoying London...
could you flick me an email?
ta, cp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Miles,<br />
great to hear your enjoying London&#8230;<br />
could you flick me an email?<br />
ta, cp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ALWAYS IN TOUCH by Can Microsoft See The Future? &#171; Miles Langley - Pop Social</title>
		<link>http://popsocial.wordpress.com/2008/09/17/always-in-touch/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Microsoft See The Future? &#171; Miles Langley - Pop Social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsocial.wordpress.com/?p=131#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] am a fan of Microsoft Surface&#8230; but little else the company releases. If this Microsoft really want to change the way they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] am a fan of Microsoft Surface&#8230; but little else the company releases. If this Microsoft really want to change the way they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blockbuster to stream movies (across multiple devices) by Paper Is Just A Device &#171; Miles Langley - Pop Social</title>
		<link>http://popsocial.wordpress.com/2008/12/02/blockbuster-to-stream-movies-across-multiple-devices/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Paper Is Just A Device &#171; Miles Langley - Pop Social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsocial.wordpress.com/?p=292#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] to save, read or delete across platforms and the system will keep up with it all.&#8221; is right. Blockbuster are looking to provide viewers to opportunity to stream a movie on one device, then finish it on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to save, read or delete across platforms and the system will keep up with it all.&#8221; is right. Blockbuster are looking to provide viewers to opportunity to stream a movie on one device, then finish it on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Obama Gets (Even More) Social by Obama&#8217;s Tool Kit &#171; Miles Langley - Pop Social</title>
		<link>http://popsocial.wordpress.com/2009/01/16/obama-gets-even-more-social/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama&#8217;s Tool Kit &#171; Miles Langley - Pop Social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsocial.wordpress.com/?p=342#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] promoting acceptance by the established business community have a look at my recent Pop Social post Obama Gets (even) More Social. There&#8217;s links to older posts in the opening sentence. Possibly related posts: (automatically [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] promoting acceptance by the established business community have a look at my recent Pop Social post Obama Gets (even) More Social. There&#8217;s links to older posts in the opening sentence. Possibly related posts: (automatically [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on THE NATURE OF THE WEB TODAY by Obamas Tool Kit &#171; Miles Langley - Pop Social</title>
		<link>http://popsocial.wordpress.com/2008/11/26/the-nature-of-the-web-today/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Obamas Tool Kit &#171; Miles Langley - Pop Social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popsocial.wordpress.com/?p=289#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] Obama&#8217;s Social Media strategy succeeded because it had the most usable, shareable and useful content that allowed for conversation to empower supporters to get involved through multiple access points and to the level they felt [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Obama&#8217;s Social Media strategy succeeded because it had the most usable, shareable and useful content that allowed for conversation to empower supporters to get involved through multiple access points and to the level they felt [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
